Landmark Legal Analysis: Supreme Court of Nepal Formally Adopts Transborder Reputation and Protects Well-Known Marks
Supreme Court of Nepal Formally Adopts Transborder Reputation and Protects Well-Known Marks
Explore intellectual property analysis and practical guidance. Visit our News section for further published articles.
Supreme Court of Nepal Formally Adopts Transborder Reputation and Protects Well-Known Marks
Read moreAn archived case note reports a Nepal Supreme Court decision concerning use of VISA for tobacco products outside the brand owner's registered classes.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that Nepal's Department of Industry recognised AIWA as a well-known trademark based on reputation and international use…
Read moreAn archived case note reports that Nepal's Department of Industry protected TikTok against a TIC TOC application for instant noodles on reputation grounds.
Read moreAn archived opposition note reports that Nepal's Department of Industry compared related goods and consumer perception despite different Nice classes.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that Nepal's Department of Industry recognised HILTON as a well-known mark in a dispute involving Hilton Academy.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that Nepal's Supreme Court upheld protection against misleading use of Scotch on whisky not established as originating in…
Read moreAn archived Nepal Supreme Court case note examines how an author's moral rights may remain relevant after economic publication rights are transferred.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Kathmandu District Court treated original artistic elements of product packaging as copyright-eligible works.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court required a closer comparison of goods and marks instead of relying only on a shared Nice class.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court set aside the Department of Industry's refusal of TOO YUMM applications in Classes 29 and 30.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court set aside the Department of Industry's refusal of Tirth Agro Technology's SHAKTIMAN application.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court set aside a refusal of GMS after comparing the marks, goods and market context with GM.
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court set aside a refusal of the TOOFAN trademark application; verify the certified decision before…
Read moreAn archived case note reports that the Patan High Court required the Department of Industry to address GI concerns raised against the HIGHLANDER mark.
Read moreA Nepal trademark case note examines when similar marks may coexist for different goods within the same Nice class.
Read moreNo Insights match that category.