Landmark Legal Analysis: Supreme Court of Nepal Formally Adopts Transborder Reputation and Protects Well-Known Marks
Supreme Court of Nepal Formally Adopts Transborder Reputation and Protects Well-Known Marks
We advise businesses, inventors and institutions on the protection, development, commercialisation and enforcement of patent rights in Nepal. Our practice covers the legal and strategic aspects of protecting inventions, from assessing patentability and developing appropriate filing strategies to preparing and prosecuting applications, managing patent portfolios and advising on the commercial exploitation of patent rights. We also advise on patent licensing, compulsory licensing, know-how and technology transfer arrangements, and the structuring of commercial transactions involving patented technology. Where disputes arise, we represent clients in matters involving patent infringement and enforcement, with advice tailored to the technical, commercial and legal considerations relevant to each invention and business.

We advise businesses, inventors and institutions on a broad range of patent matters, from protecting new inventions to enforcing patent rights in Nepal.
Our patent services include:
Provide a description of the invention, drawings, inventor and applicant details, ownership documents, and any foreign applications or registrations. We assess the filing route and confirm the required documents and deadlines before preparing a Nepal application. Foreign protection should not be assumed to secure protection in Nepal.
For patents, designs and trademarks, see the Patent, Design and Trade Mark Act, 1965. We confirm current requirements for your matter.
Seven years from registration, renewable for two further terms of seven years each, giving a maximum of twenty-one years.
No. Nepal is not a Patent Cooperation Treaty contracting state, so an international application cannot be used to enter the country. A direct national filing is required.
Twelve months from the first convention filing, supported by a certified copy of the priority documents.
A fine of up to five hundred thousand rupees. An abettor who attempts to infringe without succeeding faces up to two hundred and fifty thousand rupees.
Section 6 refuses registration where the patent is already registered to someone else, the applicant is neither the inventor nor a person who acquired rights from the inventor, or the patent would adversely affect public health, conduct, morality or the national interest.